Judicial Review Of Film Reviews
Recently, a film director filed a writ petition before the Kerala High Court to direct Union of India (Ministry of I&B), CBFC etc. to issue a “gag order…
Recently, a film director filed a writ petition before the Kerala High Court to direct Union of India (Ministry of I&B), CBFC etc. to issue a “gag order…
NCLT, New Delhi bench consisting of Justice Ramalingam Sudhakar and Sh. Hemant Kumar Sarangi in the case of Alchemist Asset Reconstruction Company v. Mr. Deepak Puri rejected an application filed by the Financial Creditor u/s 95 of the IBC, 2016
The Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India ('IBBI”) has issued a Press Release dated 01.12.2023 intimating the appointment of Mr. Jitesh John as the Executive Director of IBBI.About Mr. Jitesh John Mr. Jitesh John is an Indian Economic Service ('IES') Officer of the 2001 batch with experience serving 21 years in the Government of India at different posts.
The Delhi High Court Bench, comprising of Justices Manmohan and Naveen Chawla, have directed Google Cloud India Private Ltd. (GIC) to withhold only 8% tax while making payment to Google Asia Pacific Pte Ltd, a Singapore based subsidiary of Google LLC. The court reaffirmed that the said order was only an interim measure and it should not be treated as a non-compliance
The Kerala High Court recently held that a proceeding initiated under the Domestic Violence Act, 2005 cannot be transferred to a Family Court. Going by the definition of "respondent" under Section 2(q) of the Act, even a female living in a relationship...
In a significant ruling, the Allahabad High Court, presided over by Hon’ble Justices Saumitra Dayal Singh and Shiv Shanker Prasad, deliberated on the matter of condonation of delay and the recall of an ex parte divorce decree in the case of Smt. Jyoti Verma versus Prashant Kumar Verma (First Appeal No. 1210 of 2023).
The Patna High Court has said that the orders passed in cases of child custody cannot be made rigid and final and are capable of being altered, keeping in mind the needs of the child. The court said custody orders are always considered interlocutory orders.